News

Making sense of the markets this week: September 20, 2021

[ad_1] Each week, Cut the Crap Investing founder Dale Roberts shares financial headlines and offers context for Canadian investors.  New inflation data: transitory signs?  The week ending Sept. 17 delivered a very generous data dump in Canada, the U.S. and Europe, with updates on inflation data, economic activity numbers, housing figures and more. Portfolio managers, professional economists—and armchair economists such as yours truly—are digging through trying to make sense of it all.  Canadian inflation Let’s start with inflation data here at home. On Wednesday, Statistics Canada released its consumer price index for August 2021. The annual pace of inflation rose to 3.7% in July, marking the biggest increase since May 2011. August said “hold my beer,” and came up with an annual inflation increase of 4.1%, the highest since 2003.  Now, keep in mind that inflation, or any stat, can appear more meaningful or dire due to base effects. Today’s inflation rate is based on a comparison of where we were one year ago, when numbers were more suppressed due to the pandemic and ongoing restrictions.  That said, the base effect argument might not quite cut the (increasing price of) mustard when you look at the historical CPI on Trading Economics. Hit that 5-year or 10-year tab for charts in which that base effect argument seems to disappear. As well, many will argue that the inflation numbers are “massaged,” and that the rules change constantly. Like, let’s remove most of the expensive stuff from the CPI number.  To get a sense of true inflation, you can start by going shopping and filling up the car on the way. Keep in mind, too, that inflation will hit you differently than your neighbour or your best friend, based on your personal lifestyle and spending patterns.  From that CBC post…  “Some of the biggest contributors to the jump were the sectors that Bank of Montreal economist Doug Porter noted were in full-on ‘reopening’ mode from COVID-19 shutdowns including air travel, where the price of tickets soared 37.5% and hotel charges increased by 12%. Gasoline prices, meanwhile, were up by 32% compared to last year.” I think we can agree that inflation is heating up—but is it transitory, or is it looking to stick around a while, and do some damage to our savings accounts and real (inflation-adjusted) investment returns?  The Bank of Canada insists they see this inflation spike as transitory. Many of the issues creating inflation, such as supply chain woes, are temporary, and they will work their way out of the process.  Not everyone agrees, however. As we discussed last week, the world runs on semiconductors/chips, and many feel that the current shortage will last years, not months.  Increased wages also contribute to inflation, and that is a more sticky contributor as it’s difficult to cut wages after they have been increased.  Still, the Bank of Canada has company with many economists in the transitory camp.  From that same CBC post…  “‘Much of the increases over the past year are just making up for weakness early in the pandemic,’ [CIBC economist Royce] Mendes said. ‘With the latest readings still suggesting that much of the recent acceleration is transitory and due to base effects, supply chain shortages and surging reopening demand, central bankers will stick to the script of keeping rates on hold until late next year’.” At the same time, Bank of Montreal economist Brian Porter acknowledged the potential for inflation to be more sticky and “transitory for longer.”  “…‘rising wage pressures, robust home prices and firm energy costs all suggest that inflation is not about to quickly roll over as these other short-term factors fade,’ he added.” And, never mind firm energy prices, in an article that is perhaps shocking for many (but not for me), Eric Nuttall, portfolio manager at NinePoint Partners, suggests there is the potential for an energy crisis. We will have increasing demand for oil combined with decreased production in too many areas. That is the energy reality. Readers will know I am hedged with exposure to the energy producers’ index ETF—ticker XEG.  In the Financial Times, finance prof and advisor Mohamed El-Erian sees the possibility of stagflationary winds as some reversible factors are accompanied by supply side troubles that could last for one to two years, if not more. For example, transportation costs for goods have risen seven to 10 times in the past year.  U.S. inflation South of the border, CPI data showed a slowing rate of inflation and numbers that came in below expectations. What?  From the CNBC post…  “Prices for an array of consumer goods rose less than expected in August in a sign that inflation may be starting to cool, the Labor Department reported Tuesday. “The consumer price index, which measures a basket of common products as well as various energy goods, increased 5.3% from a year earlier and 0.3% from July. A month ago, prices rose 0.5% from June. “Economists surveyed by Dow Jones had been expecting a 5.4% annual rise and 0.4% on the month.” The U.S. recently offered some soft job numbers, as well. In last week’s post we wondered if the bad news (or soft news) might be good news. The Fed might hold off on tapering (bond-buying to suppress rates) and ease off on any rate increases that are known to cool the economy and even cause recessions.  This Reuters post discusses U.S. inflation coming off the boil…  “‘Inflation remains troublingly strong, even if it is not exploding like it did earlier in the year,’ said James McCann, deputy chief economist at Aberdeen Standard Investments in Boston. ‘If we continue to see further step-downs in inflation over the next six months, that should ease the pressure on the Fed to quickly follow tapering with interest rate rises’.” The Bank of Canada is likely to lead on increasing overnight rates.  Stepping back, let’s keep in mind that no one knows the future. We don’t know if inflation will be lasting or if it will inflict damage.

Making sense of the markets this week: September 20, 2021 Read More »

*HOT* USPS Forever Postage Stamps (100 Pack) only $44.99 shipped!

[ad_1] This is a really RARE deal on postage stamps! Right now, you can get USPS Postage Stamps (100-Pack) for just $44.99 shipped when you use the promo code FSUSTMP at checkout! Choose from five designs. That’s just $0.45 per stamp instead of the usual $0.58 and this is a RARE deal. Valid while supplies last. Thanks, Passionate Penny Pincher! [ad_2] Source link

*HOT* USPS Forever Postage Stamps (100 Pack) only $44.99 shipped! Read More »

Google and Apple said to have removed Navalny voting app as Russian elections begin – CNN

[ad_1] Google and Apple said to have removed Navalny voting app as Russian elections begin  CNN Apple and Google Remove ‘Navalny’ Voting App in Russia  The New York Times Apple, Google remove Navalny app as Russian elections begin | TheHill  The Hill Opinion | The Kremlin’s vote riggers are getting creative — and desperate  The Washington Post Putin says ‘several dozen’ in his inner circle test positive for coronavirus  CNN View Full Coverage on Google News [ad_2]

Google and Apple said to have removed Navalny voting app as Russian elections begin – CNN Read More »

Inside Look: RealTrends 2021 Brokerage Compensation Study

[ad_1] The following Q&A comes from the HW+ exclusive Slack channel, where Steve Murray, senior advisor to RealTrends, and Tracey Velt, RealTrends editorial, as they give an exclusive first look at the 2021 RealTrends Brokerage Compensation Report. During the Q&A, Murray shared some of his biggest takeaways from the data, the trends he is watching and how executive compensation has changed over the years. The full 2021 RealTrends Brokerage Compensation Report will be available next week, with this Q&A giving a first look at the data. For the study, RealTrends surveyed all the firms on the 2021 RealTrends 500 and Nation’s Best rankings, asking for annual compensation data for the 2020 calendar year. The following Q&A has been lightly edited for length and clarity. Tracey Velt: Hi everyone! I want to start out by having Steve talk a little about the report. We looked at 12 different executive positions at a brokerage to determine compensation based on region and size of brokerage. Why don’t you talk a little about the types of brokerages that participated? Steve Murray: We surveyed all 1760 brokerage firms in the REAL Trends 500 and Nations Best brokerage firms and received 140 replies. These firms were both franchised and independent and ranged in size from $1 million in gross revenues to over $400 million. They were also generally spread regionally so it was a good cross-section. This content is exclusively for HW+ members. Start an HW+ Membership now for less than $1 a day. Your HW+ Membership includes: Unlimited access to HW+ articles and analysis Exclusive access to the HW+ Slack community and virtual events HousingWire Magazine delivered to your home or office Become a member today Already a member? log in The post Inside Look: RealTrends 2021 Brokerage Compensation Study appeared first on HousingWire. [ad_2] Source link

Inside Look: RealTrends 2021 Brokerage Compensation Study Read More »

Should you help your adult children to buy real estate?

[ad_1] Arguably, it’s much harder for millennials to get their first step on the real estate ladder, compared to when my cohort bought our first homes. Housing prices were remarkably low in the 1980s compared to today; however, financing is a different story. Interest rates were as high as 20% for us, and at record lows today. All of which explains why many of today’s millennials seek interest-free or low-interest loans from the Bank of Mum and Dad (“BOMAD” henceforth). Between 50% and 75% of millennials expect to tap the BOMAD for help coming up with a down payment.  I recently discussed the millennial home ownership bind on Patrick Francey’s The Everyday Millionaire podcast. Francey is a seasoned entrepreneur and real estate investor, and CEO of the Real Estate Investment Network (REIN). These days, most REIN members who have at least one “door” (investment property beyond a principal residence) are almost by definition millionaires. I appeared despite the fact our family owns no investment real estate, apart from REIT ETFs in a purely electronic portfolio: “clicks instead of bricks,” as I explained on the show. My daughter, soon to be 30, has been in Hong Kong the last few years but hopes to return to Canada soon and is making noises about becoming a homeowner. Ironically, Helen was once briefly employed at REIN and, as I told Francey, my wife and I regret not having made the plunge into an investment property back when houses, even second ones, were much more affordable than they are in 2021. Since we have no other children, this may not be insurmountable, but I can empathize with baby-boomer couples who have two or three children looking to buy.  On one hand, you can view assistance in making a down payment as the proverbial “giving with a warm hand rather than a cold hand”—an early first installment on inheritance. On the other, not all financial advisors are on board with the idea of retiring baby boomers going into debt to finance their children’s real estate. Francey is one. “Many very successful people realize too late—or never—that they do their children a serious disservice ‘giving’ kids money to buy a home,” he says. “I think parents must be very intentional when it comes to how they support their kids…many successful people are who they are because they received no help at all, aside from encouragement and love.” Francey does not believe parents should make an outright gift of a down payment. Nor does he think parents should take on debt “unless it’s a written agreement and the repayment terms are clear.” More acceptable is a repayable loan, possibly with no interest or payable perhaps 10 years hence, but “loan only.” He has done both with his own children. “My view today is, I am absolutely the last resort/safety net, and that’s not to say I wouldn’t let my daughter and her family file for bankruptcy if it was to come to that. I will always provide a roof over her family’s head and food on the table.”  Mortgage expert and author Calum Ross, of Toronto-based The Mortgage Management Group, has some experience with BOMAD as it relates to his two daughters.  “As a divorced dad, BOMAD was restructured and now runs as a privately-held entity: BOD [Bank of Dad.],” Ross quips.  Ross’s parenting priorities are the same as his parents’ when they raised him: “One, I taught them to be thoughtful; two, I raised them with a work ethic and, three, I taught them to save money and not spend it.” His older daughter is going to university in a year, with tuition funded by an RESP. “If cap rates make sense, I may buy a house for her in second year and have her manage tenants. The cash flow can keep her rent lower if she manages it well.” This is exactly what we had thought of doing when our own daughter went to the University of Guelph a decade ago but, as I confessed on the podcast, we chickened out and ended up letting her rent for a few years—to our ultimate mutual regret.  Matthew Ardrey, wealth advisor and vice-president with Toronto-based TriDelta Financial, says there are two main ways to access capital: debt or equity. With BOMAD, it comes down to which is more cost-effective.  Most parents have a home of their own, so can access a secured line of credit at an interest rate which is a function of prime: 2.45%, at the time of publication. Most secured lines range from prime to prime + 1%, so in his example he uses prime + 0.5%. “With a rate of 2.95% on debt, we know what the parent would have to earn on their equities, after-tax, to be better off using debt than equities,” Ardrey says. If investments yield 6% overall, for someone in a 50% tax bracket (ignoring preferential rates for dividends and capital gains), the after-tax rate of return would be 3%. That’s about the break-even point for this person. With a lower after-tax return, equity is preferred; and, vice-versa, with a higher after-tax return, debt is preferred. Other factors include where and how the portfolio is invested. If it’s in a TFSA, there is no tax consideration for the return component; if it’s in an RRSP, the tax may be so punitive it would not make sense to use the funds for a large withdrawal. If it’s in a taxable account, embedded capital gains also should be considered. On the debt side, the biggest risk is rising interest rates. If rates rise in the future, this impacts the debt versus equity comparison, as well as the affordability of borrowing for the parents. Ardrey discourages outright gifting, preferring loaning funds to the child and placing a lien on the property. This protects the gift/loan for the parents. If funds are given outright, and the child marries and subsequently divorces, that gift is part of the matrimonial home and subject to division, meaning 50% of the gift goes to

Should you help your adult children to buy real estate? Read More »

Polynion

Binance Prediction

Metamask

papamiaspizza.com

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99

RAJANAGA99